Monday, February 13, 2006

Freedom of Speech is Freedom of Speech is Freedom of Speech

On Sunday, The Brussels Journal ran a translation of a great piece by Per Nyholm. This article originally ran last Friday in the Jyllands-Posten, which is the paper that called for and ran the Muhammed cartoons. Noone that I have read thus far has expressed themselves any better then Mr. Nyholm about the current battle with Islam over free-speech and Western values. Here's the translation below.

We are being pissed upon

I think it was the long departed H.C. Hansen, one of the great Danish statesmen of the last century, who – as the communists were demonstrating in front of Christiansborg [the Danish Parliament] – cast his gaze across the palace square and remarked: “I will not be pissed upon.”

Then he did what was necessary.

I feel that currently my beloved country is being pissed upon rather too much. Denmark has not been neglecting its duties on the international stage. We have supported poor people with acts and advice, we have worked for peace, we have sent soldiers, policemen and experts to all the far flung corners of the world. We have democracy, a rule of law and a welfare state. Not all is perfect, but we harbor no malice towards our fellow men.

And yet Denmark is being pissed upon. The spokesman of the US State Department is pissing on Denmark, the British Secretary of Foreign Affairs is pissing on Denmark, the President of Afghanistan is pissing on Denmark, the Government of Iraq is pissing on Denmark, other Muslim regimes are pissing on Denmark. In Gaza, where Danes for years have provided humanitarian aid, crazed Imams encourage people to cut off the hands and heads of the cartoonists who made the drawings of Mohammed for the Jyllands-Posten newspaper.

Excuse my choice of words, but all this pissing is pissing me off.

What is going on? I am not referring so much to the threats against Danish citizens and Danish commerce. Nor to the burnt down Embassies. I am thinking of a word that keeps popping up whenever the Mohammed cartoons are mentioned.

That word is BUT. A sneaky word. It is used to deny or qualify what one has just said.
How many times lately have we not heard people of power, the Opinion Makers and others say that of course we have freedom of speech, BUT.

They have said it, all of them, from Kofi Annan, the UN Secretary General, to our own Bendt Bendtsen [a Danish Politician]. Once we had to be sensitive to the easily hurt feelings of the Nazis, then came the Communists, now it is the Islamists. The reason I say ‘Islamists’ is that I do not for a moment believe all the world’s Muslims are pissing on us. I think we are dealing with thugs, fools and misled people. Those are the ones we have to deal with, and then the chickenshit politicians.

The cartoons are no longer something Jyllands-Posten can control. They have already been manipulated and misrepresented to the point that few know what is going on and fewer know how to stop it. This affair is artifically being kept buoyant in a sea of lies, suppressions of the truth, misconceptions, lunacy and hypocrisy, for which this newspaper bears no blame. The only thing Jyllands-Posten did was provide a pin-prick which has made a boil of nastiness erupt. This would have happened sooner or later. That it happened more than four months after the publication of the cartoons, raises a question of its own. Are we dealing with random events or with a staged clash of civilizations? One might hope for the former yet be prepared to expect the latter.

That is why I say: Freedom of Speech is Freedom of Speech is Freedom of Speech. There is no but.

Initially I was doubtful of the timeliness of publishing the cartoons. Later events have convinced me that it was both just and useful to do so. That they are consistent with Danish law and Danish custom seem to me less important than this: that we now know that remote, primitive countries deem themselves justified in telling us what to do. Unfortunately we must also note that governments close to us are agreeing with them in the name of expedience.

It was right and just for this newspaper to launch an offensive for Freedom of Speech, and useful, as we have now acquired new knowledge. Welcome to a brave new world where even our Prime Minister – in spite of his laudable firmness – must gaze out upon a scorched political landscape. True, his friend in Washington, George Bush, has uttered the customary condemnation of the torching of our embassies, but his State Department alludes to us as being the guilty ones in this case. The suggestion that Danish troops might contribute to democratization is buried under the charred remains of our diplomatic representations in Beirut and Damascus.

Perhaps it is time we started mopping up this mess. Perhaps Editor-in-Chief Carsten Juste ought to remove his apology which has gone stale sitting so long on the front page of our internet edition and which does not seem to interest the madmen. Perhaps our government ought to announce to Mona Omar Attia, the strange Ambassador of Egypt, that she is persona non grata.

Perhaps the ambassadors that have been called home to fictitious consultations in the Middle East should be told that they may spare themselves the cost of the return ticket.
In so far as possible The Lying Imams probably ought to be expelled. And then we ought to make an effort to support those Muslims who in a difficult situation have proven themselves to be true Citizens.

We, for our part, have no wish to be a burden to the Arab governments. We will happily withdraw our soldiers, policemen and diplomats. If they think our money smells, we will retract our aid. Our trade must make do as well as it can. We promise to not bear a grudge and, in time, we will be glad to return, but we are through with the hypocrisy. We have better things to do than being pissed upon at our own expense.

Cut down our activities in the Middle East. The world holds plenty of other opportunities.



At 4:15 PM EST, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You know something, you're right. Not only are these Muslims crazy, look at these whack job christians. They all herd together like cattle to see Mel Gibson's great vision of their very human lord and savior get the living piss beat out of him. Brilliant! The story of your favorite pacifist just wouldn't be the same if we didn't see pieces of flesh ripped off his back. Then, he gets nailed to a piece of wood, dies, and comes back to life. Scores of imbeciles pack into churches like a bunch of zombies to celebrate a story so ridiculous that were it not drilled into your head from the time you were born, it would be too absurd to believe. A child of 8 has enough reasoning power to recognize this to be complete and utter nonsense. Christians would behave no better than muslims were it not for the general disintegration of their religious beliefs. When christians actually had faith as a whole, they did some pretty sick things as well. Many of them still do. Pat Robertson obviously upholds the virtues of Christ when he decides that it is Hugo Chavez's time to die. I'm glad we have the prophet Robertson here to tell us these things. And look how closely he follows Jesus' teachings. Nowadays, christians have accepted a personalized version of relgion where anything goes as long as you say sorry and say that jesus is your savior. This pathetic display of devotion is really quite healthy I think. Perhaps soon, we can hope for the same thing with the muslims. I hope to see their religion deteriorate as christianity has so that we may eventually be rid of religion's violent tendencies. Here's an idea, since generation after generation are so easily duped into belief this trash, let's replace their religious upbringing with principles of tolerance and secularism. I mean, is it really that ridiculous? If we can convince people that some guy walks on water and raises people from the dead, and that Muhammad was really talking to an angel up in those mountains, why the hell can't we make them believe that tolerance is a good virtue to live by? At least that makes sense! That way we'd have no pricks making cartoons, no muslims blowing things up because of it, and I wouldn't have to write this nasty comment about these heaps of bullshit you people call your religions.

At 2:36 PM EST, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Funny how you don't show any support for the historian who was arrested in Vienna for questioning the validity of details of the holocaust. I thought freedom of speech was freedom of speech was freedom of speech? Or does that only apply when it works against people you don't like?


Post a Comment

<< Home